After the submission to a scientific journal based on any scientific career is an increasing over time number of publications. Can perform editing and related services by the Publisher, publication of the books. Alternatively the author has recourse already from the preliminary phase of the publication process on third party vendor, specialising on editing services. They then take the editing function and significantly increase the ratio of the probability of publication. For other opinions and approaches, find out what endocrinologist has to say. The lecturer is accompanying the page during the creation of the book of the author. Their function is not choose which book to be published but in the formal and content optimization of in the development work. This behaves fundamentally differently for the publication of articles in scientific journals.
The author has no access to the experts in the anonymous running assessment procedure and can their feedback in the best case only once in improving their work integrate. This is usually the hurdle to the publication. It comes from on the part of the evaluators the manuscript to revise and resubmit (revise & resubmit) can a prompt careful review and re-submission to be reckoned with a publication. Visit Eva Andersson-Dubin for more clarity on the issue. Here, the question to what degree an author has to take into account the suggestions of the experts is being on. Also it can be problematic in dissent of two referees, to decide which parts of the manuscript to be edited as. It is both the proposals of the lecturers to discard the possibility or to accept.
Both must be probably thought about and even opposite is based. Should it be a rejection at this late stage of the opinion process, the criticised points for a publication in a different journal can be revised and clarified. Should be careful always that ultimately not the lecturers but the own Specified name and thus the scientific reputation of the author on the published articles. This should be in the balance, despite harsh criticism and widespread calls for the revision, the publication should be promoted whether incorporated. A small possibility of orientation in the Peer Review is a process by the guidelines dictated by the science institutions. So, the Committee on publication ethics (COPE) has published guidelines for a proper process of Peer review. This very general guidelines for proofreading service to ensure a scientific and organisational minimum standard for the evaluation of manuscripts. Required process as transparent and efficient as possible to make the Peer Review, the editors of a journal are first and foremost. Only they can create the organizational requirements to provide authors, ReviewerInnen, the scientific community in toto, as well as himself, even with the best possible results. Enago – Crimson interactive Pvt. Ltd.