The Benefits

However, the curious one is the following one: as much those that are benefited, as the ones that are not embark in the tecnolotria, and become enslaved of it. The ones that is benefited become enslaved for being vitiated in the benefits. The ones that is not benefited become enslaved for being prisoners of the desire for the benefit that they do not enjoy. In other words, they are prisoners of what it has, others are prisoners of what it does not have but they desire to have. Ahead of everything what until we comment here, we can clarify the difference between natural inaquality and social inaquality.

If thus express the citizen of Geneva in ' ' second discurso' ' affirming that they are of two types: ' ' one that I call natural or physical, for being established by the nature and that he consists of the difference of the ages, the health, the forces of the body and the qualities of the spirit and the soul; to another one, that if can call inaquality moral or politics, because it depends on a species of convention and that it is established or at least authorized for the assent of homens' ' (ROUSSEAU, 1988, P. 39). The inaquality politics is established socially, or can say that it is established civilizadamente objectifying to mask or to justify privileges or dominations of ones on others. It seems us that even so Rousseau uses the word ' ' desigualdade' ' indistintivamente (in such a way for the natural plan as the inaquality established for and in the civilization), we can easily notice the difference that refers to the content. Then, what Rousseau calls natural inaquality consists much more as difference factor, since he is unprovided of social valorativo content (good and badly). The natural inaquality can be understood as difference. On the other hand, and inaquality properly said is the social one or civilized, it is established of artificial form and it brings in its seio only existing aspects in the plan of the sociability: domination, exploration.

Universal Control

It is impossible to cover the space in a trajectory continues: A furniture, when having covered supposedly the space of a position to the other in a trajectory continues and when reaching any distance of the initial position, would have that to have varied infinitely of position, therefore as in elapsing of the presumption movement all the busy positions for the furniture would have certain distance of the previously busy positions for it, no busy position for it could be immediate to the other, but between all they would have that to have had position you would intermediate of form that enters any busy positions for it would have had an infinite intermediate series (practical example: before arriving at one second position the furniture she would have that to have passed for the half of the trajectory and before arriving at the half of the trajectory she would have that to have thus passed for one room of the trajectory and infinitely). Therefore to cover the space in a trajectory she continues would be necessary that the furniture arrived at the end of infinite positions. What it is impossible, therefore the infinite does not have end. It is impossible to move of position in the space: As it is not possible to cover the space in a trajectory continues, so that a furniture could move of position in the space would be necessary that it left to exist in its position and later it started to exist in another one, but this would mean to say that the furniture leaves to exist for some time returning later a existence. What it is impossible, therefore as it does not have possibilities in the nothing is not possible to resurge of it. Comment: if something occurs is because it is possible, then if something appears of the nothing to appear of the nothing is possible and if to appear of the nothing is possible then has possibilities in the nothing and if it has possibilities in the nothing in the nothing has some thing.